Re: Better support admonitions blocks

[Adam Porter]

Hi Ihor, JD, et al,

On 4/4/24 12:04, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> JD Smith <jdtsmith@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Pandoc recently added read/write support
> > <https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/9475> for "admonitions",
> > which are a GFM construct
> > <https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/16925> already
> > supported by other org-exporters, and on GH in markdown.  This
> > refcard
> > <https://github.com/fniessen/refcard-org-mode?tab=readme-ov-file#base-admonitions>
> > references an org #{begin,end}_{note,warning,tip,caution,important}
> > syntax which pandoc now follows (though it does not support the
> > extra admonitions like danger/error/etc.).
> >
> > It would be nice to add org support for these 5 admonition blocks
> > to the C-c C-, org block structure templates, and perhaps allow
> > block face styling for these as well (ala org-src-block-faces).
>
> CCing Adam. We recently discussed "highlight" blocks in the context
> of WORG publishing.

Thanks.

> I do not see much problem adding such blocks, although I am not sure
> if we want them by default.

I would tend to agree that they probably shouldn't be part of Org's
default configuration (at least, not yet--if they were to become very
widespread in usage, then maybe we could reconsider).

> What we may do is to implement something akin link's :export and 
> :active-func parameters to allow custom fontification and export. 
> (... and add a new :structure-template parameter to auto-add them to 
> structure templates)
>
> Then, we can add optional support for all the proposed blocks that
> will define how to insert, export, and fontify them.

That would seem good to me.

As far as Worg goes, I'd be in favor of having them available on Worg by 
default; they should be useful for writing documentation.

Thanks,
Adam