[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bad interaction between org-capture entry type and file+function tar
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: Bad interaction between org-capture entry type and file+function target? |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Dec 2024 15:50:47 +0000 |
Visuwesh <visuweshm@gmail.com> writes:
> I just thought of a situation where this behaviour would be desired: a
> template could use FUNCTION-FINDING-LOCATION to ask the user to choose a
> heading (from a list, using org-ql, etc.) to capture the entry to go
> _under_ it. Here, the function would simply move the point to be on the
> heading.
> [ I am actually in the process of writing such a capture template. ]
>
> So perhaps an indicator to tell org-capture that I want to insert the
> heading exactly _at_point_ is required instead?
That's what :insert-here is for.
By default, capture location is an entry/list/table line where we want
to put capture template. Usually, it means _under_ entry, at the
begin/end of a list, begin/end of a table, etc.
Clearly, it is not documented well enough. We should improve the docs.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode maintainer,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Bad interaction between org-capture entry type and file+function target?,
Ihor Radchenko <=