Re: The less ambiguous math delimiters in tables

[Rudolf Adamkovič]

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

> It is not just about \(...\).

Of course, and I agree that a more general mechanism is needed to solve
all precedence problems, be it in tables, or (better) in general.  But,
as I said before, even if we had such a mechanism, it should not be
necessary to use it for \(...\) in tables, as there is no ambiguity, and
so no "madness", no?  Does that make sense?  Or, am I mistaken?

Rudy
-- 
"It is far better to have a question that can't be answered than an
answer that can't be questioned."  --- Carl Sagan

Rudolf Adamkovič <rudolf@adamkovic.org> [he/him]
http://adamkovic.org