[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (*) -> 1
|
From: |
Jean Louis |
|
Subject: |
Re: (*) -> 1 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:37:11 +0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.9+54 (af2080d) (2022-11-21) |
* Óscar Fuentes <ofv@wanadoo.es> [2023-01-18 17:09]:
> Sure^2. I was talking about _why_ (*) and (* a) are supported in Elisp.
> Once the language designer chose to support those expressions and
> decided that they must return a number (instead of something else like a
> partially applied function) the value they shall return comes from the
> properties of the underlying operation, of course.
OK and I understood that somebody decided to include that.
Why did they decide to include it?
Do you think it is only for `apply' reasons?
--
Jean
Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/19
- Re: (*) -> 1,
Jean Louis <=
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/20
- Re: (*) -> 1, Tassilo Horn, 2023/01/20
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/20
- Re: (*) -> 1, Tassilo Horn, 2023/01/20
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/21
- Re: (*) -> 1, Tassilo Horn, 2023/01/21
- Re: (*) -> 1, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/22
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/22
- Re: (*) -> 1, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/22
- RE: [External] : Re: (*) -> 1, Drew Adams, 2023/01/22