[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[emms-help] Re: Emms, emms or EMMS?
From: |
Lucas Bonnet |
Subject: |
[emms-help] Re: Emms, emms or EMMS? |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:48:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jorgen Schaefer <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi there!
Hello !
> a) Emms (a name)
> b) emms (a program)
> c) Emms or emms (a word)
> d) EMMS (an acronym)
>
> I'd favor a), because that's easiest to read. Option b) has the
> normal problems associated with "keep it lowercase" at the
> beginning of sentences. I also like c), as it does not emphasize
> the name-part too much. But I don't really like d), because I
> don't like capital letters too much. Of course, d) emphasizes the
> "ee-em-em-es"-pronounciation.
I like d), for the acronym. I like a) for the consistency with Emacs and
Gnus (but not ERC :)
--
Lucas
[emms-help] Re: Emms, emms or EMMS?,
Lucas Bonnet <=
[emms-help] Re: Emms, emms or EMMS?, Daniel Brockman, 2005/07/05