[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ePiX-devel] possible bug in plane#plane(P const&, P const&, P const&)
From: |
Maik Beckmann |
Subject: |
[ePiX-devel] possible bug in plane#plane(P const&, P const&, P const&) |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Dec 2007 21:24:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
Hello
The local variable perp in plane#plane(P const&, P const&, P const&), which is
later assigned to m_perp and thus returned by plane#perp(), is calculated
like this
P perp((p3-p1)*(p2-p1));
I expected plane#perp() to return the normal vector of the plane, but the
preceding statement calculated the opposite direction (see attached pdf).
If this is intended its ok for me, since then plane#perp() returns a real
perpendicular :). Is it?
Regards,
-- Maik
Skizze.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
- [ePiX-devel] possible bug in plane#plane(P const&, P const&, P const&),
Maik Beckmann <=