|
| From: | 赵睿祺 |
| Subject: | Re: [ESPResSo-users] FENE+LJ bond |
| Date: | Tue, 21 May 2019 22:44:45 +0800 (GMT+08:00) |
The reason why I use espresso is that I want to model the behavior under the magnetic field.
But I have had the configuration of the system after relaxation without magnetic field using another software. And the cutoff I use is 2^(1/6) with bonded beads and 2.5 with nonbonded beads with that software. I don’t want to waste the configuration I had.
So now I'd like to add a new bond called "FENE+LJ" in espresso. If it's too difficult then I would change to use the attractive cutoff for all the nonbonded interaction.
Thanks a lot for all your reply!
Regards!
Ricky
-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"Peter Košovan" <address@hidden>
发送时间:2019-05-21 21:39:00 (星期二)
收件人: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
抄送: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
主题: Re: Re: [ESPResSo-users] FENE+LJ bondYou could use exclusions to prevent bonded pairs from interacting with the default LJ but still you would need to separately add the WCA for each pair of bonded particles.As I said, setting a different particle type for each polymer particle is not a good solution. Having 4000 particle types will probably slow down your simulation.I engourage you again to ask the authors how precisely they did it.Finally, setting fene + LJ instead of FENE + WCA for bonded interactions makes probably very little difference because LJ and WCA differ only at values of r where FENE >> kT approx LJ > (WCA=0). Try plotting the potentials to see what I mean. So you can safely use FENE+LJ isntead of FENE+WCA without observing a difference in your results.peterI tired to set different type of each particle, since the number of particles is about 40000 and the time is very long which leads me to find a new way.I'm appreciate for your help.Best regards!Ricky
From: Peter KošovanDate: 2019-05-21 21:24To: address@hiddenCC: address@hiddenSubject: Re: Re: [ESPResSo-users] FENE+LJ bondI do not know how it works in LAMMPS that the authors used but in Espresso you can only set LJ or WCA between all pairs of particles of a given type. That makes good sense because short-range interactions of the same type of particles should be the same. You cannot set WCA only between pairs of polymer beads which are connected by a bond.If you insist on it, you can set a different type to each particle of your polymer, and then explicitly set WCA for each pair of bonded particles. But that will make your script complicated with no real benefit.Greetings,peterAs the paper said,"For the classical Kremer and Grest (KG) model, only a repulsive force is employed, i.e., Rc = 2^(1/6)σ. Such a model is close to an athermal model of polymer, lacking the ability to predict the glass transition driven by temperature. Furthermore, some simulation results reveal a negative thermal expansion coefficient without attraction."Because I want to predict the Tg, I think the cutoff should be 2.5sigma. I think I should add the fene+lj bond on my own. Do you have some better ideas?In addition, Do you mean that you would use WCA between all the polymer beads?Thanks so much!Best regards!Ricky
Actually, they did not specify in the paper for which pairs of particles they used the usual LJ potential (Eq.1). They only say that the fene + LJ (WCA) with cut=2^1/6 sigma) is used for polymer-polymer interactions. The text suggests that they used Eq.1 for all particle pairs including the polymer but that would be a very wierd setting.If you need to model exactly the same system, then I think that you should ask the authors for clarification. Otherwise, I would use WCA potential for polymer-polymer and LJ with cut=2.5sigma fro all other pairs.Greetings,peterOn Tue, May 21, 2019 at 2:54 PM Dusan Racko <address@hidden> wrote:Hi, isn't that a cutoff for the attractive potential to model magnetic particles only? Sorry, I don't know the papers, just suggestingDear Peter,Actually, in the paper, the cutoff distance of LJ potential between nonbonded beads is 2.5[sigma] while the cutoff distance of LJ potential between bonded beads is 2^(1/6)[sigma]. This can't be done by your way.Thanks anyway!Regards!Ricky
From: Peter KošovanDate: 2019-05-21 20:44To: address@hiddenCC: address@hiddenSubject: Re: [ESPResSo-users] FENE+LJ bondHi Ricky,Just set up a FENE potential between the given pair of particles, and an LJ potential between the given particle types (probably the same type) and you get exactly what you want. This is the standard setup which is just described in a weird way in the paper that you cited.The fene potential acts just between the two particles with a given id. The LJ potential acts between any pair of particles. If your pair of particles interacts both with fene and LJ, then you get the fene+LJ interaction.See also the script minimal-polymer.py in the samples directory.peterDear Sebastian,Thanks for your reply at first!I want to model the hard-soft block copolymers with magnetic particles and the copolymer model I use is from this paperIn this paper, the bond potential is FENE+LJ. Beyond that, I can also find paper using FENE+LJ potentials in https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.458541. What's more, in LAMMPS, it also uses the FENE+LJ type fene bond.I will use the FENE+LJ bond with bonded beads and the LJ potential with nonbonded beads.Regards!Ricky
--www.natur.cuni.cz/chemistry/fyzchem/Přírodovědecká fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v PrazeKatedra fyzikální a makromolekulární chemieFaculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Czech RepublicDr. Peter Košovan
Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry
Tel. +420221951029Fax +420224919752--_____________________Polymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of SciencesDubravska cesta 3845 41 Bratislava, Slovak Republic [‡]tel: +421 2 3229 4321
--www.natur.cuni.cz/chemistry/fyzchem/Přírodovědecká fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v PrazeKatedra fyzikální a makromolekulární chemieFaculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Czech RepublicDr. Peter Košovan
Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry
Tel. +420221951029Fax +420224919752
--www.natur.cuni.cz/chemistry/fyzchem/Přírodovědecká fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v PrazeKatedra fyzikální a makromolekulární chemieFaculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Czech RepublicDr. Peter Košovan
Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry
Tel. +420221951029Fax +420224919752
--www.natur.cuni.cz/chemistry/fyzchem/Přírodovědecká fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v PrazeKatedra fyzikální a makromolekulární chemieFaculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Czech RepublicDr. Peter Košovan
Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry
Tel. +420221951029Fax +420224919752
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |