Re: [Fenfire-dev] RDF

[Matti Katila]

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> Matti Katila wrote:
>> Obiviously in the graph which you have read/write access?
...
> So if this is just about, you do *not* have write access to 
> literature.rdf but you do have write access to your own .rdf, and you 
> want to see the canvases from literature.rdf in your own space, and you 
> want all your changes to go into your own .rdf, it seems pretty simple. 
> But what's the point of doing so?

As we currently do, commit, (star-)merge since someone else could have 
been doing changes. 

> I don't follow, but can we keep this discussion for later? 

Sure.

> As I said, it seems to me that the problem is to figure out how to 
> make the right information go to the right graphs, without too much 
> effort from the user or programmer-- the rest is probably 
> straightforward in comparison.

Yes, I think the biggest problem is representing private graph in UI.
Red irregular edges are not enough and that would look stupid.


   -Matti