[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth 1.1.2 release notes
From: |
Elimar Green |
Subject: |
Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth 1.1.2 release notes |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:38:40 -0700 |
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:05 AM, David Henningsson
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I started drafting on 1.1.2's changelog here:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/fluidsynth/wiki/ChangeLog1_1_2
>
> Big changes:
>
> * New CMake build system [plcl]
> * Winbuild directory dropped, autotools deprecated but still
> working
> * Rewriting of thread safety [diwic]
> * Describe the two new settings here
>
> Smaller changes:
>
> * Voice overflow settings [diwic]
> * Possible to update polyphony, up to 65536 (beyond initial setting)
> [diwic]
> * Sample rate is updatable (and jack driver updates sample rate
> correctly) [diwic]
> * To be committed: Change of bank number handling [plcl]
> * Source files moved into different subdirectories [diwic]
> * Can use RealTimeKit (on Linux) to get real-time priority [diwic]
> * Shell commands for pitch bend and pitch bend range [monk]
> * PulseAudio driver: specify media role, and allow pulseaudio to
> adjust latency [diwic]
> * Bug fixes [diwic, plcl, KO Myung hun, Felix Krause, laurent]
>
> Anything missing in the above list, or incorrectly attributed?
>
> I've also updated the autotools build, so it should be working now. So
> are we currently just waiting for the banknum stuff to be agreed upon
> and implemented before releasing 1.1.2?
>
> // David
>
Looks great!
As far as I know, its just the bank switching issue that remains.
Lets deal with that one.
I was starting to look over the code changes you made. It looks like
a pretty extensive overhaul to me and I still don't quite have a whole
picture of how you have implemented things. Does it seem to have
similar performance as previous versions? I'll review your changes
some more, to see if I can catch any potential thread related bugs or
what have you, though I'm sure its perfect ;-) I may have some
questions for you though, to try and get a better idea of how you have
done things.
Cheers!
Elimar