Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

freepooma-devel (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sat Apr 28 2001 14:48:39 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• April 28, 2001
  • Status, James Crotinger, 14:48
• April 27, 2001
  • Status, Scott Haney, 19:53
• April 26, 2001
  • RE: [pooma-dev] DynamicArray destroy methods, James Crotinger, 16:13
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Request for Review, Julian C. Cummings, 04:11
• April 25, 2001
  • Request for Review, Scott Haney, 13:18
  • RE: [pooma-dev] DynamicArray destroy methods, Julian C. Cummings, 11:57
• April 23, 2001
  • Chevron and Hydrodynamics Kernels and Operator Centerings, Jeffrey Oldham, 20:25
  • RE: [pooma-dev] DynamicArray destroy methods, James Crotinger, 17:20
  • RE: [pooma-dev] DynamicArray destroy methods, Julian C. Cummings, 16:19
  • RE: [pooma-dev] DynamicArray destroy methods, James Crotinger, 15:20
  • RE: [pooma-dev] DynamicArray destroy methods, Julian C. Cummings, 14:59
  • RE: [pooma-dev] DynamicArray destroy methods, Julian C. Cummings, 14:19
  • DynamicArray destroy methods, Julian C. Cummings, 14:08
• April 21, 2001
  • Scalar code example 1., Jean Marshall, 20:09
• April 20, 2001
  • Status Reports, Mark Mitchell, 16:32
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Metrowerks and template member functions, Julian C. Cummings , 14:49
  • Semantics of Field Operations with Different Centerings?, Jeffrey Oldham, 13:47
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Metrowerks and template member functions, Scott Haney, 13:38
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Metrowerks and template member functions, John Hall, 12:46
  • Re: FW: gcc/stl question, Mark Mitchell, 03:35
  • Metrowerks and template member functions, John Hall, 01:23
• April 19, 2001
  • FW: gcc/stl question, James Crotinger, 11:53
• April 18, 2001
  • RE: [pooma-dev] question in Intersector.h, James Crotinger, 18:05
  • RE: [pooma-dev] HOARD memory allocator, James Crotinger, 18:01
  • Re: [pooma-dev] question for language gurus, Julian Cummings, 17:25
  • Re: [pooma-dev] question in Intersector.h, Julian Cummings, 17:13
  • Re: [pooma-dev] question for language gurus, Jeffrey Oldham, 16:53
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Array size() function, Jeffrey Oldham, 16:45
  • RE: [pooma-dev] question in Intersector.h, Stephen Smith, 13:27
  • Views passed into functions do not update properly, Jean C. Marshall, 12:24
  • HOARD memory allocator, Allan Stokes, 05:14
  • Array size() function, Julian C. Cummings, 04:54
• April 17, 2001
  • question in Intersector.h, Julian Cummings, 22:57
  • question for language gurus, Julian Cummings, 22:34
• April 14, 2001
  • RE: [pooma-dev] cygwin builds.., Julian C. Cummings, 14:48
  • Intel 5.0 compilation of Pooma benchmarks: spurious asserts in optimized builds, Allan Stokes, 04:51
• April 13, 2001
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Status Reports, James Crotinger, 18:07
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Thoughts on replication & interpolation, Jeffrey Oldham, 15:27
  • Thoughts on replication & interpolation, Scott Haney, 15:07
  • Status Reports, Mark Mitchell, 14:11
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Hydrodynamics Kernel (12Apr Version), Jean Marshall, 00:15
• April 12, 2001
  • Hydrodynamics Kernel (12Apr Version), Jeffrey Oldham, 19:10
  • Re: [pooma-dev] How Write Data Parallel Statement?, Jeffrey Oldham, 16:34
  • Re: [pooma-dev] How Write Data Parallel Statement?, Jeffrey Oldham, 16:24
  • Re: [pooma-dev] gcc bug with static members of class templates?, Jeffrey Oldham, 16:16
  • Re: [pooma-dev] gcc bug with static members of class templates?, Jeffrey Oldham, 16:03
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Re: cheetah, Stephen Smith, 15:30
  • cygwin builds.., James Crotinger, 15:13
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Re: cheetah, James Crotinger, 15:05
  • Re: cheetah, Mark Mitchell, 14:43
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Domain traits, Mark Mitchell, 14:42
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Domain traits, James Crotinger, 13:48
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Domain traits, Julian C. Cummings, 12:20
  • RE: [pooma-dev] How Write Data Parallel Statement?, Stephen Smith, 12:11
  • How Write Data Parallel Statement?, Jeffrey Oldham, 11:59
• April 11, 2001
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Chevron Flow Scenario, James Crotinger, 23:34
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Chevron Flow Scenario, James Crotinger, 22:20
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Chevron Flow Scenario, James Crotinger, 22:17
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Chevron Flow Scenario, Scott Haney, 20:39
  • gcc bug with static members of class templates?, Julian Cummings, 20:07
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Chevron Flow Scenario, Jeffrey Oldham, 19:25
  • question..., James Crotinger, 18:34
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Domain traits, Scott Haney, 17:59
  • Patch: src: Spelling and Initialization Order, Jeffrey Oldham, 17:44
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Domain traits, James Crotinger, 17:41
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Domain traits, James Crotinger, 17:39
  • cheetah, Julian Cummings, 17:31
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Domain traits, Julian Cummings, 17:25
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Re: RFA: src: Spelling and Initialization Order Changes, Scott Haney, 16:43
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Chevron Flow Scenario, Scott Haney, 16:03
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Domain traits, James Crotinger, 15:32
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Chevron Flow Scenario, James Crotinger, 15:28
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Chevron Flow Scenario, Jeffrey Oldham, 15:17
  • Re: RFA: src: Spelling and Initialization Order Changes, Jeffrey Oldham, 14:52
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Domain traits, Julian Cummings, 14:14
  • Chevron Flow Scenario, Scott Haney, 12:07
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Domain traits, James Crotinger, 10:38
• April 10, 2001
  • Re: Patch: Get NewField to work with messaging., Mark Mitchell, 22:05
  • Domain traits, Julian Cummings, 21:44
  • RE: [pooma-dev] reference loop with updaters, Stephen Smith, 20:32
  • reference loop with updaters, Julian Cummings, 19:37
  • Hydrodynamics Kernel, Jeffrey Oldham, 19:10
  • Patch: Get NewField to work with messaging., Stephen A. Smith, 18:58
  • Mailing list archives, Mark Mitchell, 01:54
• April 09, 2001
  • Proposal to Add Interpolation and Restriction Operators, Jeffrey Oldham, 23:11
  • adapting Particles to NewFields, Julian C. Cummings, 17:53
  • RE: [pooma-dev] more on VC++ ide files, Julian C. Cummings, 14:08
  • RE: [pooma-dev] more on VC++ ide files, James Crotinger, 13:21
  • RE: [pooma-dev] more on VC++ ide files, Julian C. Cummings, 13:18
• April 08, 2001
  • Test, Mark Mitchell, 23:48
• April 07, 2001
  • Re: [pooma-dev] more on VC++ ide files, James Crotinger, 21:09
  • RE: [pooma-dev] more on VC++ ide files, Allan Stokes, 17:07
  • RE: [pooma-dev] more on VC++ ide files, Julian C. Cummings, 14:05
• April 06, 2001
  • RFC: src: Spelling and Initialization Order Changes, Jeffrey Oldham, 22:55
  • RE: [pooma-dev] POOMA CVS log messages, Julian C. Cummings, 20:58
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Example of bad behavior from particle boundaryconditions, Julian C. Cummings, 19:48
  • RE: [pooma-dev] POOMA CVS log messages, James Crotinger, 19:04
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Example of bad behavior from particle boundarycon ditions, James Crotinger, 16:31
  • RE: [pooma-dev] more on VC++ ide files, Allan Stokes, 15:36
  • RE: [pooma-dev] goofy Domain constructors, Julian C. Cummings, 15:24
  • Re: [pooma-dev] goofy Domain constructors, Dave Nystrom, 14:58
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Example of bad behavior from particle boundaryconditions, Julian C. Cummings, 14:44
  • more on VC++ ide files, Julian C. Cummings, 14:44
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Dotting Two Vector Fields to Form a Scalar Field, Julian C. Cummings, 14:24
  • RE: [pooma-dev] POOMA CVS log messages, Julian C. Cummings, 14:24
  • Status Reports, Mark Mitchell, 13:05
  • RE: [pooma-dev] POOMA CVS log messages, Julian C. Cummings, 12:42
• April 05, 2001
  • Re: [pooma-dev] POOMA CVS log messages, James Crotinger, 23:55
  • Dotting Two Vector Fields to Form a Scalar Field, Jeffrey Oldham, 19:32
  • POOMA CVS log messages, Mark Mitchell, 18:42
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Should we make a branch for POOMA, Mark Mitchell, 18:29
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Example of bad behavior from particle boundaryconditions, Steve Nolen, 10:20
  • Re: [pooma-dev] Example of bad behavior from particle boundary conditions, James Crotinger, 10:01
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Bugs, Julian C. Cummings, 05:00
  • RE: [pooma-dev] Example of bad behavior from particle boundary conditions, Julian C. Cummings, 04:50
  • RE: [pooma-dev] particle suggestion, Julian C. Cummings, 04:30
  • Should we make a branch for POOMA, John Hall, 02:00
• April 04, 2001
  • Bugs, Steve Nolen, 17:39
  • Example of bad behavior from particle boundary conditions, Steve Nolen, 15:51
  • RFC: Hydrodynamics Kernel, Jeffrey Oldham, 14:55
  • Patch: Evaluator/ScalarCode.h, Stephen Smith, 13:27
  • Boundary Conditions, Steve Nolen, 13:18
• April 03, 2001
  • Re: POOMA Changes from LANL, Mark Mitchell, 23:55
  • Re: POOMA Changes from LANL, John Hall, 22:09
  • Timesheet guidelines, Mark Mitchell, 21:00
  • RFA: src: Spelling and Initializer Reordering Patch, Jeffrey Oldham, 19:01
  • Patch: src/Engine/DataObject.h, Stephen A. Smith, 18:58
  • particle suggestion, Steve Nolen, 18:28
  • RE: [pooma-dev] RE: an attempt at your particle BC, James Crotinger, 16:42
  • RE: [pooma-dev] RE: an attempt at your particle BC, James Crotinger, 16:29
  • RE: [pooma-dev] RE: an attempt at your particle BC, Steve Nolen, 15:05
  • POOMA Changes from LANL, Mark Mitchell, 15:02
  • RE: [pooma-dev] RE: an attempt at your particle BC, James Crotinger, 13:30
  • Re: [pooma-dev] RE: an attempt at your particle BC, Julian Cummings, 13:26
  • RE: [pooma-dev] RE: an attempt at your particle BC, James Crotinger, 13:13
  • RE: [pooma-dev] RE: an attempt at your particle BC, Steve Nolen, 13:03
  • RE: [pooma-dev] RE: an attempt at your particle BC, James Crotinger, 12:54
  • RE: an attempt at your particle BC, Steve Nolen, 12:39
• April 02, 2001
  • RE: [pooma-dev] vector access in particles, Julian C. Cummings, 19:16
  • RE: [pooma-dev] goofy Domain constructors, Julian C. Cummings, 18:55
  • vector access in particles, Steve Nolen, 17:57
  • Re: [pooma-dev] goofy Domain constructors, Mark Mitchell, 13:14
  • Re: [pooma-dev] goofy Domain constructors, Scott Haney, 13:07
  • Re: [pooma-dev] goofy Domain constructors, Mark Mitchell, 12:43

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc