Re: [pooma-dev] Re: Pooma License: Up to Date?

[Jeffrey Oldham]

Is the attached proposed change to the README file acceptable?

Thanks,
Jeffrey D. Oldham
address@hidden

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:23:45PM -0700, James Crotinger wrote:
> Perhaps you should change it in the READMEs and leave a note there about the
> licenses being out of date. 
> 
>   Jim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Mitchell [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 2:02 AM
> > To: Jeffrey Oldham
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Subject: [pooma-dev] Re: Pooma License: Up to Date?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --On Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:30 AM -0800 Jeffrey Oldham 
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > > Do you know if the Pooma license, in the file "LICENSE," 
> > contains the
> > > correct license?
> > 
> > I believe it to be correct.
> > 
> > > At the very least, the contact URLs should be changed.
> > 
> > The problem is that *we* can't do that, at least that's what Beth
> > thought the last time I asked her.  LANL would have to do that, and
> > that's a can of worms I'm not particularly interested in opening.
> > 
> > --
> > Mark Mitchell
> > CodeSourcery, LLC
> > address@hidden
> > 

-- 
Jeffrey D. Oldham
address@hidden

README.diff
Description: Text document