[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Is Default Constructable really required?
From: |
John H. Hall |
Subject: |
Is Default Constructable really required? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:36:37 -0700 |
Gang:
In the notes on Relations (in relations.h, copied below) it states "The
RelationFunctor must be Default Constructable...", yet from the use of
it, I don't see any actual requirement for this. It seems we just pass
around const references and use the alternate required constructor
mentioned below, along with a copy constructor. I need to set up some
state in my RelationFunctors and I would prefer to do it during
construction, along with providing the correct copy constructors and a
version of this required constructor which is essentially a copy
constructor++.
So I guess my question boils down to: "How do I set and keep state in
RelationFunctors?" Any non-trivial use of Relations will require this.
Thanks,
John Hall
//
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Relation0 is a template used to construct relations, such as boundary
// conditions, that do not depend on additional fields. The Target must
be
// a Field. The RelationFunctor must be Default Constructable and
Assignable.
// In addition, it must provide the constructor
//
// template<class L>
// RelationFunctor(const L &, const RelationFunctor &)
//
// and the member function
//
// template<class L>
// void operator()(const L &) const
//
// where L is a Field. The constructor should use the arguments to
// initialize itself and the function should apply the relation.
//
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Is Default Constructable really required?,
John H. Hall <=