Re: [Fsfe-uk] Minutes

[Martin Coxall]

> > If the AFFS organisation can't decide why it exists, then why not let > it 
> > be forged in flame and disagreement? In my experience, in the long > term 
> > it will likely produce a more robust, philosophically-sound > organisation 
> > than the AFFS we have at present.
> 
> "...we have at present" makes the rather wide assumption that the AFFS would 
> want to accept you as a member.

Handbags at dawn?

So you're now suggesting that the AFFS has already started making
assumptions about which viewpoints it won't allow within its membership?

That'd be innovative for a pro-freedom organisation.

Martin