[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: Associate status application
From: |
Richard Smedley |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: Associate status application |
Date: |
Tue, 14 May 2002 09:49:37 +0100 |
MJ Ray wrote:
>
> Marc Eberhard <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Do we really need to provide a phone number? Wouldn't it make more sense to
> > only offer email, a web form and snail mail, so that we don't have to react
> > in real time? That gives us more time for a proper answer and increases the
> > tracebility of correspondences. Comments from others?
>
> I think we do, as we need to make it easy for journalists to contact us, as
> we want their assistance in getting this out there. Even if it's just a
> voicemail box, it's better than none.
A 'phone is very important. Most things can be
done by e-mail, but sometimes you need "real-
time, two way communication" ;-)
> Maybe the journos on this list have
> a better opinion on this?
"I am not a journo. I am a human being."
- Richard
--
Richard Smedley
Production Editor, Linux Format
Telephone +44 (0) 1225 442244 ext 5038
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: Associate status application, Alex Hudson, 2002/05/13
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: Associate status application, Richard Smedley, 2002/05/14
[Fsfe-uk] Re: Associate status application, Marc Eberhard, 2002/05/15
[Fsfe-uk] Re: Associate status application, Marc Eberhard, 2002/05/17