|
From: | Chris Lale |
Subject: | Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent - any action? |
Date: | Thu, 02 Jan 2003 15:50:44 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 |
Alex McLintock wrote:
Looks good to me Chris. I assume you are granting permission for anyone to use this text? I'd like to use it on my website.
Yes, fine. But in the light of comments I shall be revising it. Please omit the first line since this appears not to be true. Chris Croughton wrote:
Where they often differ is in what you are allowed to do with that source code. Both give you the right to compile it into executables and run it (it wouldn't be any use otherwise!), but OSS may limit your right to pass on those executables or to charge for them. Both generally also give you the right to modify the code and build executables with the modified source, but they may differ on whether you are allowed to pass those executables (or the modified source) on to anyone else, whether you have to pass any modifications back to the author/maintainer, whether you can distribute patches, etc.
Chris -- +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | ___ Chris Lale <address@hidden> | | / \ | | | <_/ My PC runs Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (http://www.debian.org). | | \ Robust, secure and free operating system + applications. | | `- | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |