[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study
From: |
ian |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study |
Date: |
24 Aug 2003 23:35:02 +0100 |
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 23:00, Paul wrote:
> > 8. Further case studies should be undertaken to generate
> > implementation-type specific control and
> > management methodologies.
>
> 9. Further studies should be conducted by people competetant to do it
> and who actually know what they're on about.
The time for studies is over, there have been many and they can all be
interpreted to suit the particular interest so they are largely a waste
of time and effort. Better to simply put the money that would have been
put into these studies into Open Source development and just sit back
and see what happens.
You can tell when the Government has no clue about what action to take,
they commission studies and procrastinate hoping that someone else will
make the decision for them. Fortunately other governments and industry
around the world are doing just that.
--
ian <address@hidden>
- [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Tom Coady, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Paul, 2003/08/24
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Chris Croughton, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study,
ian <=
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Paul, 2003/08/24
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Tom Coady, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Richard Smith, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Tom Coady, 2003/08/25
- [Fsfe-uk] Use of Reply-To in the mailing list, Chris Croughton, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Use of Reply-To in the mailing list, MJ Ray, 2003/08/26
- [Fsfe-uk] Reply-To, List-Id, RFCs, mail clients etc (was: QnetiQ study), MJ Ray, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Reply-To, List-Id, RFCs, mail clients etc, Tom Coady, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Reply-To, List-Id, RFCs, mail clients etc, Tom Coady, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, ian, 2003/08/25