[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] BBC Article about Linux SCO and Copyrights - BBC calls for
From: |
Robert (Jamie) Munro |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] BBC Article about Linux SCO and Copyrights - BBC calls for statements (fwd) |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Sep 2003 14:55:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
MJ Ray wrote:
From address@hidden, a pointer to
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3191281.stm
"The Linux community needs to accept that this could be a real problem,
and put
processes in place to make sure it cannot happen instead of simply
dismissing
all criticism as unfounded. "
They can't tell the difference between the Linux kernel and the GNU
tools, when it suits them. Very confused article. Maybe the BBC is
trying to drive traffic through their edited comments by trolling or
maybe they really need help understanding? Bill Thompson set up the
Guardian's "New Media Lab" but I'm not aware of him knowing about free
software.
I'm going to say something really controversial on this forum:
I think the article is quite good.
Certainly better than not having an article about the situation. Yes,
there are a couple of mistakes confusing the kernel with a distribution:
"There are over 30 million lines of program source in a Linux
distribution, if you include all the programming tools and utilities.",
and he doesn't make it clear how little of Linux is affected (things
added since 2.2 by staff at IBM related to making linux "enteprise
ready"), but apart from that it's an article that is much more
informative that misinformative to people who don't know anything about
the SCO situation.
The writer should be congratulated, with a p.s. correcting the mistakes.
Robert Munro
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] BBC Article about Linux SCO and Copyrights - BBC calls for statements (fwd),
Robert (Jamie) Munro <=