[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] List status (please read ;)
From: |
Ramanan Selvaratnam |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] List status (please read ;) |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Sep 2003 09:45:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 |
Alex Hudson wrote:
at 08:48:42 +0100 and I received at 08:50:54 +0100 :-)
[...]
Some of us talked previously about a specialised affs-pr list, intended
for alerts to news items, responses, etc. I'm fairly reticent to go
about creating a separate list, though, since the traffic we have is
often a bit up and down and it seems somewhat devisive.
why do I think this organised PR mechanism will have to be private (for
those chosen ones and those who step forward)? Even if it is mailing
list it has to be private.
I like the idea of keeping in touch via Jabber and do not think it is
too much of a task to teach someone totally new a process of how to use
a groupworking software....
have you seen Gforge?
<http://www.gforge.org>
Unfortunately the only heavy use of it AFAIK,at Blender seems to be
broken at the moment. I have created another account at [sarovar.org]
where there is no one to experiment the features to the full.
Also I am yet to see how the jabber service integrates with it.
The good thing for the PR project is one can track another user's diary
entries and possibly bookmarks among many other groupworking feature.
Voting and surveys are there.
Some nonsense like rating will have to cut out and we could have free
infrastructure that can host many projects.
The customised Mailman apparently integrates well too.
[I can volunteer to configure customise Gforge but not sure about
hosting from home. Might need a hand with Jabberd]
Certainly, the idea of setting up affs-discuss seems to have merit at
the moment. As most people will be aware, fsfe-uk is not the AFFS list
(despite the name people give it in their address books ;) - AFFS
doesn't really have a list at the moment. Creating our own would mean
our mail gets relayed on a lightly loaded server in this country, rather
than a heavily loaded one in the US. Would people be willing to
subscribe to a new list?
Yes.
Also, do people see any merit in an affs-pr list? There are some tasks
that would be useful to perform on that list - design & content of the
new AFFS leaflet, for example - but I'm not sure how long they will
If we ran an instance of Gforge this can be our
'Design (1)' project in the index along with
'PR - private (1)'and possibly the
'UK-Accounts (1)' projects.
More will accumulate before we know. We are in the UK and there is no
one else doing such AFAIK.
last. The danger is, of course, that we prevent people from
participating in some discussions by having them in many different
places.
True.
One thing that was never clear was why not host FSFE-UK under FSFE?
Best wishes,
Ramanan
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fsfe-uk] BBC Article about Linux SCO and Copyrights - BBCcalls for statements (fwd)], (continued)
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fsfe-uk] BBC Article about Linux SCO and Copyrights - BBCcalls for statements (fwd)], MJ Ray, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fsfe-uk] BBC Article about Linux SCO and Copyrights - BBCcalls for statements (fwd)], Paul, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fsfe-uk] BBC Article about Linux SCO and Copyrights - BBCcalls for statements (fwd)], Richard Smedley, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fsfe-uk] BBC Article about Linux SCO and Copyrights - BBCcalls for statements (fwd)], Ramanan Selvaratnam, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fsfe-uk] BBC Article about Linux SCO and Copyrights - BBCcalls for statements (fwd)], Paul, 2003/09/05
- [Fsfe-uk] List status (please read ;), Alex Hudson, 2003/09/06
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] List status (please read ;),
Ramanan Selvaratnam <=
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] List status (please read ;), Alex Hudson, 2003/09/06
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] List status (please read ;), MJ Ray, 2003/09/07
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] List status (please read ;), Ramanan Selvaratnam, 2003/09/06