[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Maxima-discuss] Compiling pregexp.lisp fails with GCL?
From: |
Robert Dodier |
Subject: |
Re: [Maxima-discuss] Compiling pregexp.lisp fails with GCL? |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Aug 2022 10:22:24 -0700 |
OK, great, I was able to successfully build pre120 on a gcc-4 system,
Maxima build is in progress, and it has gotten past the point where
pregexp.lisp is compiled, so I guess that's okay now.
The new executable identifies itself as "GCL (GNU Common Lisp) 2.6.12
ANSI Fri Apr 22 15:51:11 UTC 2016". I would like to recommend
pretty strongly to equip GCL with a more precise version string.
Wouldn't it be a lot better to say "2.6.13pre120" as the version
identifier? If any date is given, it seems like it should be either
the timestamp of the tagged commit, or the time at which the
executable was built, dunno what makes more sense.
I'll keep you posted about the Maxima build.
best,
Robert
- Re: [Maxima-discuss] Compiling pregexp.lisp fails with GCL?, Camm Maguire, 2022/08/04
- Re: [Maxima-discuss] Compiling pregexp.lisp fails with GCL?, Robert Dodier, 2022/08/04
- Message not available
- Re: [Maxima-discuss] Compiling pregexp.lisp fails with GCL?, Camm Maguire, 2022/08/05
- Re: [Maxima-discuss] Compiling pregexp.lisp fails with GCL?, Robert Dodier, 2022/08/05
- Re: [Maxima-discuss] Compiling pregexp.lisp fails with GCL?, Camm Maguire, 2022/08/06
- Re: [Maxima-discuss] Compiling pregexp.lisp fails with GCL?, Camm Maguire, 2022/08/07
- successive forward slashes in path, was: Compiling pregexp.lisp fails with GCL?, Robert Dodier, 2022/08/08
- Re: successive forward slashes in path, was: Compiling pregexp.lisp fails with GCL?, Robert Dodier, 2022/08/08
- Message not available
- Re: [Maxima-discuss] Compiling pregexp.lisp fails with GCL?, Camm Maguire, 2022/08/07
- Re: [Maxima-discuss] Compiling pregexp.lisp fails with GCL?,
Robert Dodier <=