[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
sizes of floats, was: +-Inf and NaN
From: |
Robert Dodier |
Subject: |
sizes of floats, was: +-Inf and NaN |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 2024 10:47:27 -0800 |
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 7:40 AM Camm Maguire <camm@maguirefamily.org> wrote:
> Does anyone care about anything other than 4 or 8 byte floats?
I know I don't, also I've never encountered, in 40+ years of numerical
programming, a problem that really needed bigger or smaller ones. I'm
not claiming those problems don't exist; only that they're uncommon to
the point of invisibility.
Creating another float type is taking on a pretty big investment in
implementation and testing. (The first person who says "OH IT'S NO BIG
DEAL" is hereby saddled with the responsibility for it.) Frankly I
don't think the investment is worth the very small expected payoff.
FWIW
Robert
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/21
- Message not available
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Camm Maguire, 2024/02/22
- Message not available
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Camm Maguire, 2024/02/26
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/26
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Camm Maguire, 2024/02/28
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/28
- Message not available
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/28
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Camm Maguire, 2024/02/28
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Camm Maguire, 2024/02/28
- sizes of floats, was: +-Inf and NaN,
Robert Dodier <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Camm Maguire, 2024/02/28
- Message not available
- Re: +-Inf and NaN, Camm Maguire, 2024/02/29
- Message not available
- Re: [Maxima-discuss] +-Inf and NaN, James Cloos, 2024/02/22
- Re: [Maxima-discuss] +-Inf and NaN, Raymond Toy, 2024/02/22
- Re: [Maxima-discuss] +-Inf and NaN, James Cloos, 2024/02/24
Message not available