[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gcmd-dev] [NEW] Advrename on steroids
From: |
Michael |
Subject: |
Re: [gcmd-dev] [NEW] Advrename on steroids |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 01:54:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
claws-mail.org |
Piotr:
>
> > Another issue: If say $c(2) conflicts with the counter 'digits' input
> > field, then the form field takes precedence. But it's a little bit
> > confusing, and of course redundant. How about removing the 'digits' field,
> > in the right side form, then the window is little more compact, and you
> > don't get into confusion with several different $c's too.
>
> Agreed, can be a bit misleading... But IMO it's far better to get rid of
> $c(2) syntax instead, and just to depend on 'digits' field only - this
> way it'd be far easier to control the results.
But only digits field means there can be only one kind of counter at a time,
and it also will not be saved to the history.