[gcmd-usr] missing dependency or just pkg naming difference?

[bendov]

I stopped after running ./configure on gnome-commander-1.10.2.tar.xz,
though it seems ready to run "make." Some of the ./configure "not found"
or "no" comments, I'm not sure if a pkg is really missing, or has a
slightly different name in Mint than in the source pkg (I've seen that
before).

Gnome-commander ./configure isn't always specific on versions or exact
pkg name.  E.G., does it want the <pkg_name-dev> pkg out of 5 other pkgs
w/ same base name?  Usually doesn't say.

1) checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
Not sure what "dependency style of gcc...gcc3" means, but gcc-8 8.1.0-5
*IS* installed. Note: I couldn't make any of the suggested commands for
configing gcc-8 work, but it's installed.  Couldn't find the exact
meaning of "dependency style...gcc3."  Maybe only gcc3's dependencies
are 100% satisfied (but not versions > gcc3)??

checking minix/config.h usability... no
checking minix/config.h presence... no
checking for minix/config.h... no

2) checking for UNIQUE... no
configure: WARNING: unique >= 0.9.3 not found, disabling unique support
Note: libunique-1.0-0  is installed v1.1.6-5. (Listed as Unstable by
Ubuntu).  I assume gnome-commander ./configure is looking for
"libunique-dev" (not installed), thus the warning ">= 0.9.3 not found?"
** Is Unique support important to GCMD?

checking for EXIV2... no
checking for TAGLIB... no
checking for chm_open in -lchm... no

3) checking for GSF... no.  Which pkg / ver?  Gsfonts is installed -
maybe not the wanted pkg / ver.

4) checking for POPPLER... no.  Which pkg / ver?  Several Poppler pkgs
are installed.
Thanks.