[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gforth] Classic or smart .S ?
|
From: |
Anton Ertl |
|
Subject: |
Re: [gforth] Classic or smart .S ? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 May 2019 08:14:31 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 10:04:22PM +0200, Bernd Paysan wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 30. April 2019, 17:12:34 CEST schrieb Anton Ertl:
> > What do you think should be the default for .S and ~~: the classic or
> > the smart .S ?
>
> The question on today's net2o chat resulted in 3 votes against the smart .S
> by
> default.
The same here and on comp.lang.forth. So I guess that we will revert
.S to be classic.
> In ~~ it's a different question, because in ~~ you can't just type in
> something else to get that something else.
I also think that ~~ should use the smart .S .
- anton