[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dynamic Superinstructions
|
From: |
Tomas Hlavaty |
|
Subject: |
Re: Dynamic Superinstructions |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2024 23:01:00 +0100 |
On Tue 13 Feb 2024 at 22:43, Anton Ertl <anton@a4.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> Only Gforth primitives are integrated into dynamic superinstructions.
> So you would have to define an additional word in prim, possibly using
> a gcc asm statement in the C part of the definition. The code also
> needs to be position-independent.
understand, thank you for your reply