[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?
From: |
Sander Vesik |
Subject: |
Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ? |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 18:30:51 +0000 (GMT) |
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Dan Kuykendall wrote:
> > e) nice, multi-system (UNO, CORBA, XPCOM, plain C, etc.) APIs
>
> Im going for XML-RPC at this point.
>
That's the API and protocol difference - if the API is agreed on, any
system (or app developer) can just write a skin deep wraper and make easy
use of it. And won't have to keep writing yet another OGS XML-RPC talking
libarary ...
> Seek3r
>
Sander
One day a tortoise will learn to fly
-- Terry Pratchett, 'Small Gods'
Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison- was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Sander Vesik, 2001/02/06
Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison-was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Dan Kuykendall, 2001/02/06
GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Lloyd Llewellyn, 2001/02/08
- Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Sander Vesik, 2001/02/08
- Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Dan Kuykendall, 2001/02/08
- Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?,
Sander Vesik <=
- Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Dan Kuykendall, 2001/02/08
- OGS Project, Dan Kuykendall, 2001/02/08
- Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Sander Vesik, 2001/02/08
Please remove me from the list, Will Wong, 2001/02/08
Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison - was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Jeffry Smith, 2001/02/06