[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?
From: |
Dan Kuykendall |
Subject: |
Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ? |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Feb 2001 10:44:52 -0800 |
> That's the API and protocol difference - if the API is agreed on, any
> system (or app developer) can just write a skin deep wraper and make easy
> use of it. And won't have to keep writing yet another OGS XML-RPC talking
> libarary ...
Well if you can explain (hopefully in code) how this would work, Im all
for it. As far as I can tell XML-RPC is the API and in most cases http
would be the protocol. But the line is very blurred
Seek3r
- Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, (continued)
- GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Lloyd Llewellyn, 2001/02/08
- Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Sander Vesik, 2001/02/08
- Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Dan Kuykendall, 2001/02/08
- Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Sander Vesik, 2001/02/08
- Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?,
Dan Kuykendall <=
- OGS Project, Dan Kuykendall, 2001/02/08
- Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Sander Vesik, 2001/02/08
- Please remove me from the list, Will Wong, 2001/02/08
Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison - was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Jeffry Smith, 2001/02/06