|
From: | Vijay Bellur |
Subject: | Re: [Gluster-devel] The return of the all-null pending matrix |
Date: | Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:49:16 +0530 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
On 07/15/2013 12:41 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Vijay Bellur <address@hidden> wrote:I checked the logs and did not notice anything unusual in the logs. Do you have multiple clients involved? Does turning off eager-locking through:No multiple clients. Is it then relevant to test eager-lock?
FWIW, it is. self-heal daemon and a client can also contend for locks. Messages of this sort make me wonder where the contention is coming from:
[2013-06-28 21:45:30.217139] I [afr-lk-common.c:1075:afr_lock_blocking] 0-gfs34-replicate-0: unable to lock on even one child [2013-06-28 21:45:30.217189] I [afr-transaction.c:1063:afr_post_blocking_inodelk_cbk] 0-gfs34-replicate-0: Blocking inodelks failed.
-Vijay
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |