[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Feature request]: Regression to take more patches i
From: |
Justin Clift |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Feature request]: Regression to take more patches in single instance |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:31:18 +0100 |
On 31/07/2013, at 2:26 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 09:17 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> On 07/31/2013 08:44 AM, Anand Avati wrote:
>>>
>>> Multiple VMs will solve the problem, but I guess we need to
>>> figure out
>>> how to get a bigger box etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can the "worker" build machines be behind a firewall? I'm working on
>>> getting the old Sunnyvale lab machines on-line in our new lab. Can
>>> we use some of those?
>>>
>>>
>>> That should work, I think!
>>
>> I've escalated the ticket to get those machines on-line. We have some
>> pretty beefy machines to throw at it that.
>
> ... should be good for running lots of VMs.
Please be careful of this bug when you're getting the machines online:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981741
Running the regression test on an unpatched readdirplus enabled kernel
will take out the box every time (kernel panic).
RHEL/CentOS 6.3 GA (no kernel updates applied) is known to work. Niels
has built some recent RHEL 6.4 kernels with a fixed readdirplus too,
which should also work. (get them from him?) :)
+ Justin
--
Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
twitter.com/realjustinclift
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Feature request]: Regression to take more patches in single instance, Anand Avati, 2013/07/31
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Feature request]: Regression to take more patches in single instance, Jeff Darcy, 2013/07/31