[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Feature request]: Regression to take more patches i
From: |
Niels de Vos |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Feature request]: Regression to take more patches in single instance |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:02:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:31:18PM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 31/07/2013, at 2:26 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> > On 07/31/2013 09:17 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> >> On 07/31/2013 08:44 AM, Anand Avati wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Multiple VMs will solve the problem, but I guess we need to
> >>> figure out
> >>> how to get a bigger box etc.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can the "worker" build machines be behind a firewall? I'm working on
> >>> getting the old Sunnyvale lab machines on-line in our new lab. Can
> >>> we use some of those?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> That should work, I think!
> >>
> >> I've escalated the ticket to get those machines on-line. We have some
> >> pretty beefy machines to throw at it that.
> >
> > ... should be good for running lots of VMs.
>
> Please be careful of this bug when you're getting the machines online:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981741
>
> Running the regression test on an unpatched readdirplus enabled kernel
> will take out the box every time (kernel panic).
>
> RHEL/CentOS 6.3 GA (no kernel updates applied) is known to work. Niels
> has built some recent RHEL 6.4 kernels with a fixed readdirplus too,
> which should also work. (get them from him?) :)
I've opened up that bug and added a link to download x86_64 test
packages and patch. Anyone who hits this problem and has a valid
entitlement to get support from Red Hat, is encouraged to open a support
case through the Red Hat Customer Portal to get notified when the
appropriate errata is released.
Cheers,
Niels
- Re: [Gluster-devel] [Feature request]: Regression to take more patches in single instance,
Niels de Vos <=