[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gm2] gm2 segfault
From: |
Gaius Mulley |
Subject: |
Re: [Gm2] gm2 segfault |
Date: |
12 Oct 2007 18:25:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 |
Dmitry Shatrov <address@hidden> writes:
> В Втр, 09/10/2007 в 15:47 +0100, Gaius Mulley пишет:
> > Dmitry Shatrov <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > The following program causes a segmentation fault (I do "gm2 -c
> > > test.mod")
> > >
> > >
> > > MODULE test;
> > >
> > > VAR A : CARDINAL;
> > >
> > > CONST B = A;
> > >
> > > END test.
> >
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > can you check that you've done a cvs update in the gcc-4.1.2/gcc/gm2
> > directory. Or you could
> >
> > cd gcc-4.1.2/gcc
> > rm -rf gm2
> > cvs -z3 -d:pserver:address@hidden:/sources/gm2 co gm2
> > cd ../..
> >
> > and rebuild.
> >
> > My version of gm2 now detects this as a compile time error,
>
> Same for me now (it says "cannot assign a variable to a constant").
>
> I have a program for JPI Modula-2 in the front of me, and it looks like
> in JPI such assignment is OK. Is it a deviation from PIM and/or ISO?
>
> Regards,
> Dmitry
Hi Dmitry,
that is certainly odd behaviour - I think that
> > > VAR A : CARDINAL;
> > >
> > > CONST B = A;
should always generate a compile time error for both PIM and ISO
regards,
Gaius
- [Gm2] gm2 segfault, Dmitry Shatrov, 2007/10/07
- [Gm2] gm2 segfault, Dmitry Shatrov, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Gm2] gm2 segfault, Gaius Mulley, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Gm2] gm2 segfault, Dmitry Shatrov, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Gm2] gm2 segfault,
Gaius Mulley <=
- [Gm2] gm2 segfault (checked with GPM and XDS), John O Goyo, 2007/10/12
- [Gm2] gm2 segfault (checked with ULM), John O Goyo, 2007/10/12
- Re: [Gm2] gm2 segfault (checked with GPM and XDS), Andreas Fischlin, 2007/10/12
- Re: [Gm2] gm2 segfault (checked with GPM and XDS), Gaius Mulley, 2007/10/12