[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] "unsinged": enumeral type?
From: |
Udo Giacomozzi |
Subject: |
Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] "unsinged": enumeral type? |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:59:33 +0100 |
Hello strk,
Tuesday, October 31, 2006, 10:38:18 AM, you wrote:
s> Since m_vertex is unsigned you might try using '2u' as a literal to
s> force 'unsigned' nature of that number.
I'm not goind to change the AGG code, but when I understand the
problem I might solve it in the renderer code since it may be a
template-related problem.
s> Anyway, the 'enumeral' vs. 'non-enumeral' warning seems unrelated to me...
s> Rather, how is path_cmd_move_to defined ? Is it an enumeral type ?
Yes:
http://www.antigrain.com/__code/include/agg_basics.h.html#path_cmd_move_to
Udo
- [Gnash-dev] "unsinged": enumeral type?, Udo Giacomozzi, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Gnash-dev] "unsinged": enumeral type?, strk, 2006/10/31
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] "unsinged": enumeral type?,
Udo Giacomozzi <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] "unsinged": enumeral type?, strk, 2006/10/31
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] "unsinged": enumeral type?, Udo Giacomozzi, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Gnash-dev] "unsinged": enumeral type?, strk, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Gnash-dev] "unsinged": enumeral type?, strk, 2006/10/31
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] "unsinged": enumeral type?, Udo Giacomozzi, 2006/10/31