Re: [Gnash-dev] what is 'klash' ?

[strk]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:56:43AM +0100, Bastiaan Jacques wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 09:26 +0100, strk wrote:
> > Sorry for the question, but I'm very confused about the topic,
> 
> That's definitely not something you should be apologising for.
> 
> > and the autoconf scripts seems as confused as me.
> > So what *is* klash ? Is it the plugin ? Or is it the standalone
> > executable using KDE GUI ?
> 
> Klash consists of two things:
> 
> 1) the KDE gui executable gui/klash
> 2) the klash kpart plugin, also built in gui/.
> 
> I believe it is currently not possible to build either one (assuming
> there have been no recent changes to the build system to the opposite
> effect): they must always be built in pairs.

Ok, so it *was* correct to have a check in ./configure.ac aborting
if anyone attempts to build klash *plugin* with non-kde *gui*, right ?
(that check is now commented out).
Also, it is *wrong* defining USE_GUI_KDE iff either kde gui was requested
*or* klash was enabled, right ? (this is currently what ./configure does,
possibly ending up with two enabled GUIs)

> That said, we have to decide on the naming system for Gui executables (a
> few proposals were mentioned in an earlier thread I started).

IIRC last words were for a plugin architecture. In 0.7.2 this will
surely NOT happen, so we have to find a compromise.
The question is: do we want to enable building *both* klash *and*
a !KDE gui'd gnash for 0.7.2 ?

--strk;