gnash-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code


From: strk
Subject: Re: [Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:15:02 +0100

On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 12:09:00PM +0100, Michael Meier wrote:


> 12:04:34: [$Id: Boolean.as,v 1.8 2006/11/05 00:45:27 rsavoye Exp $]
> 12:04:34: SWF - Gnash-cvs-20061117
> 12:04:34: PASSED: boolObj [30]
> 12:04:34: FAILED: boolObj.tostring != undefined [33]
> 12:04:34: FAILED: boolObj.valueof != undefined [36]
> 12:04:34: XFAILED: expected: "false" obtained:  [39]
> 12:04:34: XFAILED: expected: false obtained:  [40]
> 12:04:34: XFAILED: expected: "true" obtained:  [43]
> 12:04:34: XFAILED: expected: true obtained:  [44]
> 12:04:34: XFAILED: expected: "false" obtained:  [47]
> 12:04:34: XFAILED: expected: false obtained:  [48]
> 
> 
> ... to be a bit verbose.
> 
> Why aren't the valueof and tostring methods registered?

If you gnash (or gprocessor) with the -va switch (verbose actions)
you should get more information about what's going on and what is failing.

--strk;





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]