[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question
From: |
Rob Savoye |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:10:40 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) |
Udo Giacomozzi wrote:
> Agree, although this in my opinion still means that Adobe dictates the
> specification.
We'll be following Adobe's "spec", but we'll be developing our own
documentation about the spec, including the differences between subtle
implementation issues. There are actually quite a few places where Abode
doesn't follow their own specification...
> So, this means that Gnash will _always_ be one step behind.
Gnash runs on many more platforms than the Adobe player, so who's
behind who ? :-) If the Gnash user community starts creating interesting
and useful extensions to Flash via the extension mechanism, I believe
Adobe will follow us... and if not, I don't really care.
- rob -
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question, (continued)
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question, John Gilmore, 2006/11/27
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question, Udo Giacomozzi, 2006/11/27
- Re: Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question, Martin Guy, 2006/11/27
- Re[4]: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question, Udo Giacomozzi, 2006/11/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question, strk, 2006/11/29
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question, Udo Giacomozzi, 2006/11/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question,
Rob Savoye <=
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question, Udo Giacomozzi, 2006/11/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question, Rob Savoye, 2006/11/27
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question, Udo Giacomozzi, 2006/11/27
Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash extensions question, Rob Savoye, 2006/11/27