Re: [Laszlo-dev] [Gnash-dev] YouTube video via OpenLaszlo

[strk]

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:34:28PM -0500, Henry Minsky wrote:
> It's got the entire runtime library in it, we don't attempt to link against
> the runtime to only use functions which are referenced. It just prepends the
> compiled runtime library to the compiled app.  It's possible to compile the
> app code separately if it would help debug the opcode bugs, but it won't do
> anything useful when it runs without the runtime library.

It would help being able to produce the *simplest* SWF.
Does the compiler only output actions or also normal blocks ?
I mean, in the example code you send me (a single canvas),
is the DEFINESHAPE tag used or it it drawn using calls to 
the runtime lib ?
Is it possible to skip the runtime library ?

--strk;

> 
> 
> 
> On 2/12/07, strk <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:15:45PM -0500, Henry Minsky wrote:
> >> I haven't tried gcj for a long time, it did look very promising, but
> >there
> >> was always
> >> one library or another that my apps would need for some  pointless
> >reason
> >> that had not been implemented yet.  Like you needed the AWT library in
> >order
> >> to do some math operation or something...
> >
> >The JTS Topology Suite is full of math, and builds fine with gcj.
> >AWT shouldn't be needed if not for GUIs.
> >
> >Back on the topic... is it normal that a test so simple contains
> >so much actions ? Flasm output is over 1 MB. Can you see it ?
> >
> >--strk;
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Henry Minsky
> Software Architect
> address@hidden

> _______________________________________________
> Gnash-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev


-- 

 ()   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
 /\   Keep it simple!