[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test
From: |
Udo Giacomozzi |
Subject: |
Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Nov 2007 21:50:49 +0100 |
Hello Bastiaan,
Sunday, November 4, 2007, 9:26:54 PM, you wrote:
BJ> The current implementation does not take into account that a shape may
BJ> be defined by several paths. Instead, it calls point_test() on every
BJ> single path in the shape definition. This leads to results that are
BJ> sometimes wrong.
Ok, the method I described in my previous post would not suffer from
this problem.
Now I remember the problem (which I described a while ago). A path
might cotain only one single edge (= 1 line). It is not said that a
path needs to be closed.
Anyway, just looking at the single edges of all paths would work just
fine.
Udo
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Sandro Santilli, 2007/11/04
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/11/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Sandro Santilli, 2007/11/05
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/11/05
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Bastiaan Jacques, 2007/11/05
- Re[3]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/11/05
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Bastiaan Jacques, 2007/11/06