Re: [Gnash-dev] Stable branch of Gnash

[Bastiaan Jacques]

In my opinion it is necessary to have some sort of review policy, if we
want to keep our developers together (which we all do, I think). While
fixing the testsuite and having things compile are very useful, it does
not solve the problem of (tree-wide) code quality degradation. I think a
review policy could solve most of that problem. Such a policy would be
especially important where large-scale changes are contemplated.

Bastiaan

On Fri, 21 May 2010, John Gilmore wrote:

>  *  We figure out why Rob's pre-checkin test runs are not showing
>     things that Benjamin's post-checkin test runs make obvious.
>  *  We keep the tree compiling and passing its test suite almost
>     every day.
>  *  If we have really made youtube usable with the hacks and kludges
>     about plugin reporting of version numbers, etc, then I hope we
>     can cut a release sometime soon, so the distros can pick it up as
>     an update and make gnash usable for the most popular video site.