[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity
From: |
strk |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:19:46 +0100 |
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:32:22AM -0700, Rob Savoye wrote:
> On 12/20/10 10:13, strk wrote:
>
> > Important is something users will be pretty disappointed about.
> > Critical doesn't let you develop (say: can't build or crashes at startup)
>
> But that would be a Blocker then...
Sure, anything from Blocker and above would be also blocker ...
> I think adding a Critical field is
> unnecessary. My definition of Blocker matches your definition of Critical.
so you consider Security more severe than a bug blocking development ?
1. Wish
2. Minor
3. Normal
4. Important
5. Blocker
6. Security
--strk;
() Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
/\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
- [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, strk, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Rob Savoye, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, strk, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Rob Savoye, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, strk, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Rob Savoye, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, strk, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Rob Savoye, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity,
strk <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, John Gilmore, 2010/12/20
[Gnash-dev] Re: Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2010/12/20