Re: [Gnash-dev] Removal candidates

[Sandro Santilli]

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:23:42AM +0100, Benjamin Wolsey wrote:

> I also give higher priority to the requirements of at least one of the
> remaining active developers, who would like to work on features without
> being slowed down by the sheer amount of unmaintained and indisputably
> unused code.

I think a good compromise could be to not require that changes
in interfaces should come with adaptation of all client code, except
a well known set.
For GUIs, this would be: gtk,kde4,sdl,fb and "dump"

What do you all think ?

--strk; 

  ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
  /\   http://strk.keybit.net/services.html