[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?
From: |
Sandro Santilli |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ? |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:07:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 07:13:04AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
> On 09/16/11 03:16, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>
> > It turns out I was wrong. The "happy run" of buildbot was with
> > a patch prepared by Gabriele truly reverting your ffmpeg commits.
>
> I reverted my patch fully, I saw the segfaults with the existing
> patch, not the one I applied.
Where did you see it ?
I see a normal build with 5c76984eea636cdf301b70012a77d8d8e7f6e611, see
http://www.gnashdev.org:8010/builders/squeeze-linux-x86/builds/664
I see segfaults with f5170a8879abdeb7f99176d8444bcdd6785d120a, see
http://www.gnashdev.org:8010/builders/squeeze-linux-x86/builds/665
I see segfaults with 9d4e24b875ebeba72852ede9aa90082142ffa4e3, see
http://www.gnashdev.org:8010/builders/squeeze-linux-x86/builds/666
No segfaults with a patch applied over 9d4e24b, see
http://www.gnashdev.org:8010/builders/squeeze-linux-x86/builds/667
I see segfaults with aaa3f2cabc126384802337c1c8f86a4c8c895b38, see
http://www.gnashdev.org:8010/builders/squeeze-linux-x86/builds/668
So, first segfault ever spotted is with:
commit f5170a8879abdeb7f99176d8444bcdd6785d120a
Merge: b8f483b 99cedd1
Author: Rob Savoye <address@hidden>
Date: Mon Sep 12 19:53:52 2011 -0600
Merge branch 'master' of git.sv.gnu.org:/srv/git/gnash
Previous successful build was with this:
commit 5c76984eea636cdf301b70012a77d8d8e7f6e611
Author: Gabriele Giacone <address@hidden>
Date: Sun Sep 11 10:48:42 2011 +0200
Fix build on sid with libav 0.7.1.
Patch from http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?33696 adapted to support
older versions. Thanks chithead!
There are no builds for in-between commits, but all in-between commits
are yours (rob) and related to ffmpeg.
I'd either bring the repository to 5c76984eea636cdf301b70012a77d8d8e7f6e611
(first known success) and ask you to file bugs for any issue that commit
gave to you or apply the workaround patch applied with build 667 above
(which likely has the same effect).
In any case, Gabriele and you are the only one who pushed anything to
the repository so one you (whoever broke it) of you should take care of
fixing the segfaults. All clues in my hand point to you, but I might
have missed something.
> > What do we do now ?
>
> About what, a feature freeze ?
About fixing the segfaults...
--strk;
() Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
/\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Gabriele Giacone, 2011/09/13
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/14
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/14
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/15
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/16
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/16
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Benjamin Wolsey, 2011/09/16
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?,
Sandro Santilli <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] 8.9.10 in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/29