Re: [Gnash] Writing Gnash-friendly flash applications (was: Gnas building and running succesfull on amd64)

[strk]

On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:36:51PM +0100, strk wrote:

> Both Ming, swfc and swfmill are able to generate every (virtually) tag of an 
> SWF,
> while MTASC can only generate the ActionScript bytecode.
> Ming, swfc and MTASC contain an ActionScript compiler while with swfmill you 
> have
> to use ASM-like syntax. Another asm-only tool is flasm (flasm.sf.net), which 
> we
> don't have a testing framework for (yet).
> Ming additionally supports asm-like syntax.
> Swfc uses Ming action compiler internally.

An integration to the above:
At time of writing MTASC supports AS3 syntax (classes) while Ming
(and thus swfc) doesn't. It's currently being worked on.

--strk;