[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive
From: |
Stayvoid |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:47:57 +0300 |
> Yeah, for patches it's convenient to have the file attached.
OK.
> .py to the file name? I'd argue against it.
I strongly disagree.
"The filename extension was originally used to easily determine the
file's generic type." [1]
Imagine a system without extensions. It will be such a mess!
> The person running the software doesn't need to care (or know) what its
> written in.
It's usually better to provide more information.
.py is more informative that just "a file."
I've looked through some projects written in Python. [2, 3, 4] All of
them have the extension for the source code.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filename_extension
[2] https://github.com/pybrain/pybrain
[3] https://github.com/scipy/scipy
[4] https://github.com/numpy/numpy
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, (continued)
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Stayvoid, 2012/02/25
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Sam Geeraerts, 2012/02/26
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Sam Geeraerts, 2012/02/28
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Stayvoid, 2012/02/25
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Karl Goetz, 2012/02/25
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Sam Geeraerts, 2012/02/26
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive,
Stayvoid <=
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Karl Goetz, 2012/02/26
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Stayvoid, 2012/02/26
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Sam Geeraerts, 2012/02/28
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Stayvoid, 2012/02/27
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Sam Geeraerts, 2012/02/28
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Stayvoid, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Stayvoid, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Sam Geeraerts, 2012/02/28
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Stayvoid, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Debderive, Sam Geeraerts, 2012/02/20