[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] cleaned section in Parkes.yaml
From: |
Sam Geeraerts |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] cleaned section in Parkes.yaml |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Mar 2014 22:27:52 +0100 |
Op Sat, 22 Mar 2014 23:08:02 -0400
schreef dww <address@hidden>:
> I investigated the list of packages in the cleaned section Parkes.yaml
> with Wheezy source. Next to the package name I indicated yes if fixed
> in Wheezy, no if not and commented where there were complications.
> Sam, you may want to respond to those comments.
Many thanks.
> batik: I believe yes based on the changes in debian/new-upstream
> in Wheezy, you may want to double check,
> http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/batik/batik_1.7
> +dfsg-3.debian.tar.gz
Looks good.
> db4.7: appears no, I guess you have not heard from Oracle about
> mt19937db.c yet about upgrading the Artistic licenxe
> # savannah 29840
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: 29840
> info: null
I haven't. I will ask them again.
> db5.1 was added in Wheezy same issue as db4.7 and db4.8.
OK.
> debian-faq: apparently no, I found no
> http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/gnewsense/packages-parkes/debian-faq/
> page as indicated in the debian/control file.
> # savannah 37992
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: 37992
> info: null
I must have forgotten to push it to the bzr repo. I'll fix that.
> doc-linux: I cannot find the doc-linux package in Wheezy or the
> name of the package that contains the content but I presume it is not
> fixed.
> # savannah 40741
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: 40741
> info: null
Was removed after Squeeze release. See news in QA page [1]
> doc-linux-fr was updated in Wheezy, so it will need to be fixed if
> it builds.
Ack.
> iceweasel: no, but I did not quite understand the discussion in
> the bug, is there a direct patch to getting icecat?
> # savannah 28177
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: 28177
> info: null
We cherrypick (some of) Icecat's changes. I believe there's quite a big
difference between Squeeze's and Wheezy's Iceweasel, so this will need
some work.
> kdebase: no appears to be in kde-baseapps in Wheezy
> # savannah 33695, savannah 39678
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: [39054, 39678]
> info: null
Ack.
> lensfun: no, file is now in /lensfun-0.2.5/build/tibs/
> # savannah 41007
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: 41007
> info: null
Ack.
> liferea: no, but they moved the location of the browser list in
> code.
> # savannah 33639
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: 33639
> info: null
OK.
> linux-2.6: no, Wheezy is on linux-3.2 so I am sure it will have to
> be cleaned.
> # ?
> bug_ref: null
> id: null
> info: null
>
> linux-latest-2.6: no, Wheezy is on linux-3.2 so I am sure it will
> have to be cleaned.
> # savannah 38001
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: 38001
> info: null
I believe it's pretty clean in itself, maybe changing only the
request_firmware calls is sufficient.
> live-build: yes, as far as I can determine
> # savannah 38898
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: 38898
> info: null
Cool.
> openbox-themes: no, also Artistic License 2.0 needs to be added to
> base-files
> # savannah 39630
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: 39630
> info: null
And still the same in unstable last time I checked.
> psutils: yes
> # savannah 35791
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: 35791
> info: null
Nice.
> screenlets: Wheezy did a fix by adding text to debian/copyright
> however that did not fix the upstream LICENSE file.
> # savannah 32239
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: 32239
> info: null
Hm, sloppy.
> texlive-extra: looks like the non free fonts are gone (30988),
> but I could not find a Debian bug for it that indicates it was fixed,
> however, looks like the IEEEtran.bst file is still installed (39679)
> and still refers to the Artistic 1.0 license.
> # savannah 30988, savannah 39679
> bug_ref: *sv
> id: [30988, 39679]
> info: null
Ack.
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/doc-linux.html