[gNewSense-users] Re: Copyright, but no license: Free or not?

[Matthew Fisher]

About the files in the kernel, which contain copyright statements but no 
license information -- I'm persuaded by Sam Geeraert's rationale for not 
worrying about them:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnewsense-users/2008-12/msg00027.html

As he says, things which are clearly proprietary would be of higher 
priority. That said, it might be worthwhile to come back to this issue 
later. That would be easier if we flagged the files now.

Does anyone with Lisp skills feel like adding a new license type option to 
the KFV script for "Copyright, but no license, assumed to be GPLv2."? Or 
would anyone object if I made that change?

http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Kernel/Kfv-script