[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] I want to help improve the website
From: |
Karl Goetz |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] I want to help improve the website |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:53:52 +1030 |
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:42:02 +1030
Karl Goetz <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:33:14 +0100
> address@hidden wrote:
>
> > Hi Luis,
>
> Hi both,
> (I've moved pitof's post to the bottom).
>
> > >
> > > Another thing I think is important is that the pages should follow
> > > the W3C recommendations for markup (XHTML) and style (CSS).
> > > Currently, some of (or all?)
> > > the pages of the website don't validate:
> > >
> > > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.gnewsense.org%2F&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0<http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.gnewsense.org%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0>
> > >
> > > I'd like to hear What you think about my proposal.
>
> I see no good reason for us to try and make pmwiki produce valid
> markup.
>
After saying that, I wondered how much work it would be to get us
validating. Turns out the errors we have seem to be largely from the
skin itself.
4 of them are the skin being stupid, so they are now fixed.
If you want to work out a fix for the last one, I'm happy to provide
you with the skin in a tar.
So while I don't take back my comment I'll add a proviso - "Its not our
job to make it produce valid markup, but we may as well aim for it if
its easy" ;)
kk
> If we were to write our own website, then yes, There would be a call
> for it to be valid ([x]html, css and accessible.)
>
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian user / gNewSense contributor
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature