[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] gNewSense three years on
From: |
Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix - |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] gNewSense three years on |
Date: |
Wed, 06 May 2009 20:31:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) |
Sam Geeraerts wrote:
Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix - schreef:
So where to now?
Brian and I had a chat about this. We feel that we have brought this
project as far as we can. We would like others to take the reigns.
The primary concern to the person or people who want to take over is
Software Freedom, pure and simple.
Does that mean you guys are leaving the project or just going to play a
less prominent role?
depends on what happens next
Can you explain a bit what it means to fill one or both roles? That way
people can see if they have the time and the skills that are needed and
if they are interested.
"community leader"
"person to handle code"
so what they want is to understand what FSF compliant free is
if someone wanted to drive it to create a full distro great
this is to break from upstream either on a release by release basis and
rebuild against a linux-libre kernel
the most that can be obtained from our build method which in itself was
a large work designed to be repeatable
no matter what, what we did was designed to be repeatable
and we got a couple of full releases out the door and a couple of point
releases
more than some less than others
we gave ourselves a primary goal of freeing ubuntu
we did that
a side effect we kind of forked the linux program (and survived ;-))
now what
if someone has the skills and wanted to take this project to downstream
debian (given what has happened on the mipssel side)
or keep x86 from Ubuntu
and do other arches from Debian or some such
or build a full new distro
do this last one I will give a much shortened version of what needs to
be done
create a source tree
build a base system
then expand that system to have its own build of gcc and other things to
make a toolchain
then you would build a full set of packages
then you would package them
(if you want to have sane real life users)
and you would have to work out how you keep in touch with changes upstream
it is something that can be planned and executed
Sam, so I guess I am saying, what it entails, depends on the person who
takes over.
NOTE THIS:
we picked the LTS on the basis that it was low maintenance
upstream does a lot of the work
So whoever this person or people are - go for it - your call.
the important thing is the sticking to Freedom
In any case, thanks for starting the distro and all the work you've done.
you are welcome
Happy anniversary, everybody, and congratulations to all of those who
helped get us this far. I'm especially thinking of our freedom
verifiers; it can be a bit boring sometimes, but someone's got to do it.
May our success multiply and let completely free software be ubiquitous
in the following years.
with a bit of luck yes :)
Regards,
Paul