[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] Burning iso - integrity check problem
From: |
Sam Geeraerts |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] Burning iso - integrity check problem |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:12:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100415) |
James Freer wrote:
So all is well - i'll do an install on my spare machine tomorrow and
experiment - then install for good on my new machine next week
Awesome. Welcome to the gNewSense community.
notes--check-iso.txt
*** Notes for checking iso
******************************
* a] check the download *
* b] then check burnt CD iso *
******************************
1] download iso to Desktop
2] copy md5sum to text file
e.g.
897d81b3c2493b4779dea45d6b7f041c gnewsense-livecd-deltah-i386-2.3.iso
save as md5sum--gnewsense-2.3
3] Terminal
address@hidden:~$ cd Desktop
address@hidden:~/Desktop$ md5sum gnewsense-livecd-deltah-i386-2.3.iso
897d81b3c2493b4779dea45d6b7f041c gnewsense-livecd-deltah-i386-2.3.iso
address@hidden:~/Desktop$
4] copy md5sum to text file and compare.
If all digits same then OK.
You could also do:
wget http://cdimage.gnewsense.org/MD5SUMS
md5sum -c MD5SUMS
It will complain about missing files, but it compares the iso file you
have automatically.
5] Burn CD... ignore K3B or Brasero integrity checks!
Put CD in drive and go to terminal
e.g.
address@hidden:~/Desktop$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 19G 15G 2.9G 84% /
varrun 760M 100K 760M 1% /var/run
varlock 760M 0 760M 0% /var/lock
udev 760M 72K 760M 1% /dev
devshm 760M 12K 760M 1% /dev/shm
lrm 760M 40M 721M 6%
/lib/modules/2.6.24-28-generic/volatile
gvfs-fuse-daemon 19G 15G 2.9G 84% /home/james/.gvfs
/dev/scd0 614M 614M 0 100% /media/cdrom0
Just comparing md5sum should be sufficient.
address@hidden:~/Desktop$ md5sum /dev/scd0
897d81b3c2493b4779dea45d6b7f041c /dev/scd0
address@hidden:~/Desktop$
copy md5sum to text file and compare.
If all digits same then OK.
*eof
(trim big K3b log)
Please quote only relevant parts in your replies [1].
[1] http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html#ss2.1