|
From: | Paul O'Malley |
Subject: | Re: [gNewSense-users] Parkes Freedom Verification |
Date: | Thu, 26 May 2011 18:57:30 +0100 |
User-agent: | KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-0.slh.1-aptosid-686; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; ) |
On Thursday 26 May 2011 18:13:51 Jason Self wrote: > I'm running a FOSSology instance [1] to scan the repository and verify that > everything is free software. > > All of the "A" packages [2] completed this morning, and I've filed the > first bug report [3] using the information that FOSSology provided. More > are coming as it found several packages with licenses that permitted only > non-commercial use. > > Is anyone interested in helping me verify the freedom status of the > upcoming Parkes release? Please contact me if so. > > [1] http://mistakenbear.com/ > [2] http://archive.gnewsense.org/gnewsense-three/gnewsense/pool/main/a/ > [3] https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?33408 > > > _______________________________________________ > gNewSense-users mailing list > address@hidden > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users Interesting Anyone like to contact the debian file packager. On i386 the file is now GPLed somewhere along the way I am sure a conversation too place with: Paolo Severini address@hidden However the "copyright" file in ~/atp-1.2/debian This package was put together from sources obtained at: sunsite.unc.edu:/pub/Linux/system/printing/atp-1.2.tar.gz by Hamish Moffatt <address@hidden> there are some even more interesting comments in changelog for the same version lots of comments and bugs closed my interest here is why does apt-get source on i386 debian differ from mipssel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |