[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Oct 2003 14:47:42 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Neil Stevens <address@hidden>
> > As far as I know there's nothing preventing arch from being used
> > _exactly_ like CVS, with everyone committing to the same archive (and
> > there's no obstacle to moving to more distributed development in that
> > case either).
> CVS has server-side hooks. A move from CVS to arch loses that
> functionality.
I have some questions: do CVS server-side hooks get to vote on whether
or not a transaction completes? Do they get to postpone a second
transaction until after the hooks from a first transaction completes?
If the answers are both `no', then arch has server-side hooks in the
CVS sense too. If either or both answers are `yes', then, yes, it's
reasonable to say there's a functional difference here.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Robert Collins, 2003/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Ethan Benson, 2003/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Robert Collins, 2003/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Robert Collins, 2003/10/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Neil Stevens, 2003/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus,
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Neil Stevens, 2003/10/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Miles Bader, 2003/10/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Ethan Benson, 2003/10/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Miles Bader, 2003/10/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Ethan Benson, 2003/10/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Miles Bader, 2003/10/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Miles Bader, 2003/10/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus, Tom Lord, 2003/10/12