[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2
From: |
Samium Gromoff |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2 |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:20:46 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At 17 Oct 2003 18:44:08 +0900,
Miles Bader wrote:
>
> Samium Gromoff <address@hidden> writes:
> > Well, let me mention Lua on this one.
> > http://www.lua.org/
>
> Hmmm, never saw that one before. It looks very nice -- they seemed to
> have well resisted the usual temptation to get all wacky...
The nice thing about it is that while you can use it just as a language,
actually "A fundamental concept in the design of Lua is to provide
meta-mechanisms for implementing features, instead of providing
a host of features directly in the language."
Erm, this passage is not exactly english i suspect, but i hope you get
the idea.
> -Miles
> --
> Next to fried food, the South has suffered most from oratory.
> -- Walter Hines Page
>
regards, Samium Gromoff
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, Charles Duffy, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Samium Gromoff, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Miles Bader, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Miles Bader, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Paul Hedderly, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2,
Samium Gromoff <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Tom Lord, 2003/10/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Florian Weimer, 2003/10/17